|
Location: Oakland Public
Library, Temescal Branch, 5205 Telegraph Ave. (This meeting only)
Introduction to decision-making
process. Introductions: Sunni Sabini, facilitator, Kevin
Reilly, Laura Wells, Patti Marsh, Budd Dickinson, Greg Jan
(proxy for Suzanne Baker); Evan G; Leslie
Bonett, Jim Aiken, John Klopf, Kenny Mostern, Martin Illian,
John Selawsky, Bob Marsh, Kate
Tanaka, Lee Amosslee, Howard Chong. (County Councilors in
bold.) Late arrivals: Leslie Dinkin (proxy
for Lisa Stephens), B Soffer.
Announcements were made.
Consent calendar: Endorse
the Urban Roots proposal for the Gill Tract; and the proposal passes
by consensus.
Agenda review: The agenda
was reviewed and adjusted. Leslie Dinkin is timekeeper
Action items
- Letter to state Coordinating Committee
regarding Mike Feinstein (Budd). Paragraph four in the proposal
change to "The state CC is about to send has sent a letter." Concern
over "taking a side" and wanting to ask all the Greens to resolve
it internally. Suggestion that we informally communicate it to
State CC via our representative, instead of making a formal resolution.
Concern that Mike Feinstein has not completed all financial paperwork,
and that the CC may be in the right in writing about his errs
(although they may have not done it in a manner we would have
wanted). Suggested for re-working the proposal, pass by EMT if
needed. Budd, Kevin, Bob, Laura are willing to work on revising
it.
- Budd Dickinson for BART Board (Budd).
Willy Kennedy resigned, and there is a vacancy for District 7.
Budd has applied. BART Board will review candidates and appoint
soon. About 16 people have taken out application packets, including
the son of the Mayor of Richmond. The term is four years, so it
ends November 2004. Budd plans on running for the position in
November 2004. Current racial composition: 1 African-American
out of 8, 2 Asian Americans. Concern about having an all-white
county council endorsing a white person to the Board in a District
that is one of the few that could elect an African American. Four
unresolved concerns. Extended for two minutes. ®Councilors vote
8-2-0 to approve the proposal. Lee expressed that GPAC shouldn't
make decisions about endorsements based on personal relationships.
Budd says he's running as the progressive candidate. Lee feels
this is cronyism because we don't know who the other candidates
are. Also he feels the group doesn't use the consensus process
properly. (Short stretch break. Lee left the meeting, and then
John Klopf took over minute taking.)
- Support Common Agenda Regional Network
(Patti). Patti's been representing Greens at Common Agenda (a
coalition of peace groups in the east bay who share how they're
doing, etc). It's dues time and she thinks we should join as a
group. The cost is $25.00. They have no local website. Written
material is passed around. No concerns. ®Proposal passes by consensus.
- Discussion Item Capacity Building (Sunni):
At the end of the last meeting we had a list of all the different
groups that exist in the GPAC. [List is posted on the wall] she
understood that the Outreach Working Group (OWG) was going to
take action on this list during the last month. Each group was
going to become volunteer-ready and give contact information for
new volunteers to the outreach committee. Goal for leadership:
Leadership functions and structures exist. Work assigned to leadership
structures gets done. Patti: OWG is ready for volunteers and so
are the newsletter and tabling subcommittees. John K: website
is ready as of Monday the 17th (actually a subcommittee of OWG).
Kenny: Media committee is ready and has needs he'll mention in
his report. Greg: finance/fundraising will be ready within a month
(fundraising letter will be sent out within a month and then they'll
be ready). Bob: finance committee agreed to increase sustainers
as their main goal and get going on this by March. Greg: Campaigns/voter
guide will be ready for volunteers in April. Bob: Admin committee
wants people who want to do office work (clean up office, send
thank you letters, etc.). Working Group / Committee contacts ---
Volunteer Coordinator: Patti Marsh. OWG: Patti Marsh. Tabling:
John Morton. Newsletter: Suzanne. Website: John Klopf. Media:
John Selawsky. Finance: Bob Marsh. Campaigns/Voter Guide: Greg
Jan. Administration: Martin Ilian. Each group should develop projects
and pass info to OWG later. Groups that need attention: Council
Vacancy. Bob reports that they started in June or July but hasnÅft
done anything yet. The first task was to decide if we need more
council members. Bob thinks we need additional members, especially
women, on the committee but Lee is not interested in finding members
since he feels we don't need any more Councilors. Leslie D. and
Budd volunteer for the committee. Greg: in the last 6 months,
we have wanted to fill vacancies but the working group hasn't
done so. He feels the directive doesn't need to be discussed unless
we want to decide to change the mission. Leslie B. thinks we don't
have a choice, because of the law; we must go forward and fill
the seats until there are 13 people. Kevin thinks we really need
to find a councilor from District 4 in Oakland that should be
easier to fill than seat from Fremont or Livermore. Leslie D.
states there are 6 names for the working group. Kevin opts out.
Leslie B. thinks Lisa wanted to convene the working group. Leslie
D. agrees to contact Lisa and convene the group this month by
email. Peter asks about proportional representation vs. at-large
for our group. Bob says there is an electoral reform committee
on the state level, so this might change. Our by-laws are at-large.
LauraÅfs concern is if three people are against something, you
can have minority rule (three people can kill something until
you have fifteen people on the council). Leslie B. says our intention
was to work with the county registrar to accept our by-laws or
find out why not. John Selawsky thinks our by-laws do need help
- one example is the problem of standing aside and how that affects
voting. Leslie D will be the placeholder but won't do any work.
Peter volunteers to be on the group. Sunni: what should we focus
on next time? The group discussed the consensus decision-making
process and the 80% super majority vote issue. Greg requests that
we ask the State CC what other counties do and offers to do that
on the national level. Kenny wants to discuss an increased capacity
to do political action for this group.
Reports (see meeting agenda
for previously submitted written reports).
- Media report (Kenny). For his press
advisory about him being the Green contact wasn't supposed to
contain new information. Gill tract development - he'd like to
do a press release, but when it matters) contrary to the feeling
at the end of the last meeting that we should do one now). He's
going to be writing this and he'd like to have actual Greens at
the council meeting with a sign to generate press interest. Generally,
turnout at meetings helps, and he'll do press releases when they
matter. Montclarion article - he was quoted extensively, but decided
not to be the "Green Party Spokesperson" because there was no
direction from the group. Question: would the Green Party like
to be recognized when a reporter calls him? He could have said
that and gotten it in the paper. Laura states he can always identify
as a Green Party activist, give your reply, and possibly refer
to other people in the county for various issues. Kenny agreed.
More discussion. Kenny says he's hearing that he should state
the Green Party position if the party has done something on the
issue in the past or if it's in the ten key values. Otherwise
he will be a "green party activist."
- Treasurer's Report (Bob). Study the
statement of accounts, especially for your working group, and
ask questions if any. Also, there's a statement of actual expenses
vs. budget. See if you're on track by using 2/3 as a benchmark
because we're 2/3 of the way through the year. Of course that
doesn't work for seasonal items. The minuses on the bottom are
debits. It means we spent more than our income. Bob captures the
information about types of cash or check and tries to keep track
of money from newsletter, Green Sundays, etc. But he hasn't gotten
with people to decide whether/how to do this for all committees.
Our fiscal year is July-June. The credit card service charge is
offset by the gains made by credit card contributions, but the
amount of expenditure is very high. The previous treasurer signed
a 4-year lease at $40/month and we're locked into it. We can re-negotiate
it in two years.
- Outreach Committee (Patti). Written
report is within the agenda. John Morton wants to see ten tables
going in our county - minimum. There's potential to get people
from many places. Laura is the only person with a regular table,
and there are about 8 people. So if we have 6 per table plus 20
for dropouts, we need 80 people to do tables. Greg says we had
150 volunteers for campaigns, and we can get the people needed.
Additional items: Proposed
Oakland anti-loitering law (Kenny). Only two Oakland City Council
members oppose the proposed ordinance. Kenny would like the GPAC
to oppose the ordinance and organize Greens to attend the City Council
meeting on Tuesday, 2/11/03. Summary of ordinance: if a police officer
believes that any group of four people is loitering with the intent
to sell drugs, they can issue a ticket for $100 (2nd is $250, 3rd
is $500, 4th is arrest). This is based on the judgment of the police
officer.
Closing
Pluses |
|
Improvable |
|
|
|
- Sunni asked if Lee would say something before he left.
- Prevented people with strong personalities from speaking
out of turn.
- Facilitator kept us moving on even though situation was
tough.
|
|
- We should be holding the group together and promote consensus
instead of falling back on the 80-20 vote.
- People don't respect time limits.
- If we have agenda items that look like they're going to
be difficult, and we need additional information, please ask
for that information ahead of time, instead of bringing it
up at the meeting.
- Same people keep trying to oppose things by finding extremely
valid reasons to object.
- Time constraint mandates against communication.
- Focus on alternatives for consensus (maybe re-read it before
every meeting). We shouldn't fall back on voting.
- Reports submitted in writing ahead of time didn't work
as well as we thought because people want to talk during reports.
|
Adjourned
Close
Window
|
|